Thursday, 29 September 2011


Studies in 2011 Could Decide MS Theory's Validity

Preliminary studies have suggested that a phenomenon called Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI), a reported abnormality in blood drainage from the brain and spinal cord, may contribute to nervous system damage in MS. ...................



http://www.nationalmssociety.org/research/intriguing-leads-on-the-horizon/ccsvi/index.aspx

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

Tuesday, 27 September 2011


www.examiner.com
Researchers have discovered a way to produce huge amounts of myelinating cells in a short amount of time – paving the way for revolutionary treatment in ..............

http://www.examiner.com/science-news-in-national/scientists-make-breakthrough-discovery-for-multiple-sclerosis-and-cerebral-palsy

us1.campaign-archive2.com


http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=646d7fd51cbebd959c3a5b033&id=60088c9582&e=b8cf8ef3e2

It has become clear that one of the main issues with CCSVI is venous hypertension; raised pressure within the venous system of the brain. This increased pressure is transmitted to the deep veins in the white matter of the brain and in time affects the integrity of the tight junctions of the blood brain barrier.......

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

Post by Brian Sullivan- I like this one

MS means: Major Struggle. Menacing Sickness. Maybe Someday. My Sentence. Might Stumble. Malfunctioning System. Money Sucker. Many Symptoms. Mean Spots. Medication Shackles. Missing Something. Moving Slower. Mind Slipping. Memory Sucks. Myellin Scars. Moping Sometimes. Madly Searching. Marbles Stolen. Major Set-back. Motor Sputters. Multiple Scars. Multiple Sclerosis. One day, I hope it has one meaning....Mystery Solved

www.youtube.com
CCSVI Symposium 2011 - Second Annual Meeting Crowne Plaza Hotel Times Square, Manhattan New York, NY July 15-17, 2011 www.ccsvicare.com Venous Hemodynamics i...

http://life-gameon.blogspot.com/2011/09/ccsvi-treatment-in-hindsight-ellas.html



A look back at my journey since my daughter's ccsvi treatment: http://life-gameon.blogspot.com/2011/09/ccsvi-treatment-in-hindsight-ellas.html
life-gameon.blogspot.com
How can I describe this blog: a diary, washing my dirty laundry in public, sharing my experience of my daily battle with my daughter's MS, or my journey through my inner life? You tell me...

Wednesday, 7 September 2011


 The Breakthrough Treatment for MS | View it in your browser.
The Essential Health Clinic
Dealing with Valves in CCSVI

Treatment of CCSVI has developed rapidly in the past 2 years with over 75 centres worldwide now offering differing forms of angioplasty procedures. Some centres are very research orientated with a steady flow of good quality research adding to the body of evidence supporting CCSVI as a real entity worthy of intervention.

The draft NICE guidelines in the UK has endorsed this approach and has encouraged further investigation of CCSVI in MS in the UK. We are pleased to have contributed to this process by direct conversations with the NICE committee and providing patient evidence of the effectiveness of this treatment.The excellent safety data from our clinic in Edinburgh is quoted in the draft guidance as well as the studies from Bulgaria and Poland.

It has become clear that one of the main issues with CCSVI is venous hypertension; raised pressure within the venous system of the brain. This increased pressure is transmitted to the deep veins in the white matter of the brain and in time affects the integrity of the tight junctions of the blood brain barrier.
Venous hypertension develops principally because of intraluminal abnormalities such as abnormal membranes, webs and most commonly abnormal jugular valves. A secondary effect of the decreased flow caused by an intraluminal abnormality is the development of collateral veins where the smaller veins enlarge due to increased blood flow. This in turn reduces further the flow in the jugular veins and can lead to stenosis or narrowing of the jugular veins. The presence of stenosis is usually an indicator of intraluminal abnormalities but venous hypertension can still exist in the absence of stenosis.

Treating the valves and other intraluminal abnormalities is therefore a central issue in the treatment of CCSVI and one that all the treatment centres in the world are dealing with. A balance has to be struck however, between aggressively treating the valves with high pressure balloons to reduce venous hypertension, and the possibility of vein damage. Excessive pressure could cause scarring and possibly further venous problems.

We recently discussed this issue with some of the world's leading experts on CCSVI.

Dr Salvatore Sclafani from New York pointed out that the veins are totally dependent on the venous blood for their nutrients and therefore this flow should not be disrupted for any significant period of time. Overenthusiastic and aggressive use of balloon catheters to disrupt valves could be damaging to the veins in the long term if the oxygen supply is reduced by the very procedure which is aimed at restoring normal flow. Current practice in the UK is similar to other centres where the valves and other intraluminal obstructions are treated with a combination of balloons, cutting wires, cutting balloons and particularly double balloons.

Dr Ivo Petrov in Bulgaria has performed over 1300 CCSVI procedures and was closely associated with the development of CCSVI in the UK. His practice is similar to that in the UK when dealing with valves but feels that although current treatment options are bringing good results, that further technical advancements will continue to improve the procedure.

The use of stents in the neck veins has been one solution to this problem but it has become clear that this approach is associated with increased complications. Professor Simka in Katowice has reported that the use of stents in his unit has dropped from 50% of patients to only 5%.

Professor Paulo Zamboni has obviously given this area much thought and has filed a patent for a device called a valvulotome. He feels this will be the most effective way of dealing with abnormal valves without damaging the vessel wall but on further questioning it became clear that there is no suitable valvulotomes available at present which are the right size for use in the jugular veins.  This type of device is designed to permanently damage the valves without damaging the surrounding veins. It has been used in cardiology to remove the valves of the saphenous veins used in cardiac grafting.

There has been much discussion about the use of valvulotomes between some of the world's leading endovascular CCSVI surgeons including Professor Paulo Zamboni, Mr Donald Reid and Mr Ted Diethrich of Arizona. The current devices are designed to damage normal valves where the cusps are in the expected positions. In CCSVI we face the problem of abnormal valve cusps which will require a different design. Another consideration is the use of these devices in the neck veins could increase the risks in what is a very safe intervention. The anatomy of the jugular veins is such that the left jugular has a marked twist immediately after the valve, which could increase the risk of vein damage with the use of a valvulotome. The right jugular is usually straight which would make this form of treatment potentially less hazardous. Given the nature of the venous system where the drainage is shared bilaterally in the venous sinuses, it begged the question, would treatment of only the right jugular produce a reduction in venous hypertension? We sought the opinion of a Professor of flow mechanics who did extensive calculations on flow and pressure before concluding that he thought that it would improve venous hypertension.
The valves in the jugular veins are not essential with over 20% of the population having no valves in these veins. It is thought that permanent disruption of the valves using balloons alone is not possible at present and that over aggressive high pressure ballooning may risk venous damage.

The future of CCSVI treatment may well involve the development of a new device such as a valvulotome which can safely disrupt the jugular valves and so reduce venous hypertension over a long period of time. We are working with our International colleagues over the development of this.

In the meantime, the encouragement of new research by NICE brings the prospect of angioplasty treatment on the NHS closer to reality. We would encourage all our patients to comment on the current draft guidance from NICE before the end of the public consultation period on 21st September 2011. You can see these onhttp://guidance.nice.org.uk/IP/891/DraftGuidance.

As it stands, the current draft guidance will help to stimulate interest in CCSVI in the UK and increase the prospect of NHS treatment in the future. It would be hoped that by the time this has become established, techniques will have improved and the valve issue with have been at least partly solved.

Here in the UK, we are at the forefront of these efforts worldwide and will be aiming to continue to provide a  world class service to patients requiring CCSVI treatment.
Our mailing address is:
Unit 75, Mitchell Arcade, Rutherglen, Glasgow. G73 2LS
Copyright (C) 2011 Glasgow Health Solutions Ltd (T/A Essential Health Clinic)
All rights reserved.






Sent to <<Email Address>> — why did I get this?
unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences
Glasgow Health Solutions Ltd · Unit 75 · Mitchell Arcade · Rutherglen, Glasgow FY6 8JX

Wednesday, 31 August 2011

Poland: The Movie!

Here's a little montage of the trip to Poland for the Liberation Procedure. It's the last little film with Shelly Telly for a while - we'll be back with another co-production in about a month.





Thursday, 25 August 2011


 The Breakthrough Treatment for MS | View it in your browser.
The Essential Health Clinic
Effectiveness of CCSVI Treatment

CCSVI is undoubtedly one of the major discoveries in medicine this century. To actually define a new medical condition with anatomical abnormalities is a breathtaking development.

It is no surprise that it has created considerable controversy in the medical world. How could we have missed something so important and indeed there are some published papers which cast doubt on the very existence of CCSVI? Having observed the lesions on Doppler ultrasound, venogram and with intravascular ultrasound, it is clear that this is a real condition and in time all doubts will be cast aside.

The area where there is still some doubt however is whether treating these lesions produces a worthwhile clinical benefit.

CCSVI is a great discovery but is it a breakthrough in treatment for patients with MS and other neurovascular conditions?

The Bologna conference in March 2011, from the International Society of Neurovascular Disease (ISNVD), was a great platform for the presentation of new research into CCSVI. It was also a good forum for introducing the next generation of studies which are aimed at investigating the effectiveness of CCSVI treatment.

The current president of ISNVD is Professor Robert Zivadinov; a consultant neurologist from Buffalo University in New York. His background is in Multiple Sclerosis research mainly into pharmaceutical treatments for the disease. It was very clear from his conference presentations, and in conversation, that he is an academic heavyweight who has concluded that CCSVI is a very important area requiring clinical investigation. He is involved in one of the three randomised controlled trials into CCSVI treatment and has a strong association with Paulo Zamboni and the University of Ferrara.
This combined team from these two Universities, Buffalo and Ferrara, have published an early trial on the effectiveness of treatment in the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (1).

Although the number of patients was small, fifteen in total, the results are suggestive of a positive effect from CCSVI treatment. There was no control group in the study but the angioplasty treatment was staggered with a group of eight patients treated initially and the other seven treated after a six month delay.

One of the traditional study endpoints in MS is the frequency of relapses which was reduced in the early treatment group. Two of the initial group had a relapse in the next six months as opposed to five from the seven who were in the delayed group (had not been treated at that point). Of even greater significance was the fact that the brain volume of the treated group was reduced compared to the untreated group. This would suggest that treatment of the venous outflow from the brain, reduces swelling and inflammation. As Prof Zivadinov suggests, the numbers are too small to make any firm conclusions but the positive outcomes give great encouragement for future research.

As part of our ongoing investigative approach to CCSVI treatment in Scotland, we are collecting a large amount of data
including an independent assessment of neurological function. Early indications are that our results are very similar to those being published and presented at International conferences. It will be some time before we have the data fully analysed but we are very encouraged by the objective improvements reported both here in the UK and abroad,

The largest randomised controlled trial is due to start in Italy , BRAVE DREAMS, is looking at several hundred patients and will hopefully be of a size that can allow more concrete conclusions to be drawn.

Another New York based study at Albany University, under the direction of Dr Manish Mehta, is a prospective randomised double blind trial which aims to recruit 600 patients. Initial results were presented at the Second CCSVI Conference in New York in July 2011. 48 patients who had undergone angioplasty treatment were assessed after 4.5 months using the Expanded Disability Severity Score (EDSS). The EDSS is a very difficult score to improve but in these patients there was a statistical improvement in those with relapsing remitting MS and secondary progressive MS. The patients with primary progressive did not improve on EDSS. 79 patients were evaluated with a timed 25 foot walk which showed significant improvements. He also reported that there were improvements in fatigue and quality of life indices for those who had undergone treatment.

While these results are far from conclusive, in combination with the excellent safety data which has recently been published, they are very encouraging and suggest that CCSVI is not just a major discovery but may also have opened the way for improved treatments for MS.




References :
  1. P. Zamboni, R. Galeotti, B. Weinstock-Guttman, C. Kennedy, F. Salvi, R. Zivadinov,  European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 12 August 2011 Venous Angioplasty in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Results of a Pilot Study

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

Vein procedure to help those with MS | News | Nursing Times

Vein procedure to help those with MS | News | Nursing Times

The're beginning to take notice; keep feeding them information and results


pa.press.net, Updated: 24/08/2011 04:03

New research into MS gets go-ahead

A procedure which could relieve symptoms for some people who have MS is to be researched further
A procedure which could relieve symptoms for some people who have MS is to be researched further
The go-ahead has been given for further research into a procedure which could relieve symptoms for some people who have multiple sclerosis.
The procedure, called percutaneous venoplasty, aims to improve blood flow from the brain by using a small inflatable balloon or stent to widen narrowed veins in the neck which carry oxygen-depleted blood.
Multiple sclerosis is the most common disabling neurological condition affecting young adults. Around 100,000 people in the UK have MS.
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) is proposing in its draft guidance that the procedure should be used in the context of research only, so further evidence on its safety and clinical efficacy can be developed.
It has been suggested that there could be a link between narrowed veins - called chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency, or CCSVI - and the progression of MS.
Professor Bruce Campbell, chairman of the independent committee that develops Nice's interventional procedures guidance, said: "Multiple sclerosis can be a distressing and disabling condition with a lack of effective treatments.
"This means that it is really important to find out whether percutaneous venoplasty is clinically effective and safe for use in the NHS.
"Based on the existing evidence, we believe that clinicians should only consider offering percutaneous venoplasty as a treatment option for people with MS who fit the diagnostic criteria for CCSVI, as part of structured clinical trials.
"In particular, we would welcome controlled research comparing percutaneous venoplasty against 'sham venoplasty', in the same way that drug treatments are compared to a placebo.
"This is so that we can learn more about whether venoplasty works and for how long. Further research could also improve the understanding of the relationship between MS and CCSVI, as this is very unclear at present."

Monday, 22 August 2011

Mobilty pre-Poland: A retrospective blog

This little film shows you a series of clips Dugald and I filmed in the days before we set off on the 2nd August.
A record of the 'state of play' is important to me, just in case I forget how things were.  If I  improve or worsen is almost secondary to my wish that  the  correction of CCSVI has positive effect on MS. In the mean time a 'getting on with it 'approach helps.



Hopes for Liberation Procedure : my retrospective thoughts late one evening in July

Shell and I have started to meet again to edit the footage Dugald took of the Poland trip. This first little film is of me recording my hopes for the trip, last week in July, a week before we set off. 


Thursday, 18 August 2011

2 weeks post angioplasty procedure.

Its been 2 weeks since the angioplasty in Poland. The question I'm asked endlessly; any improvements. Yes and No , I mention before that there has been no Damacene moment, I did not expect it but I believe there have been changes by degrees. Bearing in mind I am in the group of  pw MS who respond the least , ie PPMS , EDSS score of 6.5 and having been diagnosed for about 20 years: I wasn't expecting much.

However I am pleased to relate I have felt better by degrees, clearer thinking, creative juices flowing, increased  motivated,  more energy.
I choke less and have fewer naps although I still need these periodically.
These are things I notice and by the people I am most close too. That in itself is heartening . CCSVI just feels so right , far more than just the  auto immune theory which I believe plays a part in this complex disease.

It will be more realistic and there -fore telling when I finish my annual leave and I'm back to work. I work 4 days , 5 hours a day as a antenatal and postnatal  midwife. I will blog again in 2 weeks and then hopefully with a video too.

 I'm looking forward to my follow-up in Poland in February to check my veins and a repeat MRI scan .  Until then  I will bathe in the belief that I have a future and that the end of the line is not inevitable through MS.

Saturday, 13 August 2011

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ccsvitoronto/4858055233/in/set-72157624532159859/lightbox/

Some very inspirational quotes on offer from some very insightful people.
Read and share.

You may need to cut and paste the link on to your browser to view.  If any body knows correctly please email me. I'm willing to learn. Jenny

Monday, 8 August 2011


he Breakthrough Treatment for MS | View it in your browser.
The Essential Health Clinic
CCSVI Update
A clear understanding of Multiple sclerosis has proved elusive for generations of doctors and scientists.

The first suggestion that there could be a vascular component to the disease dates back 180 years to Sir Robert Carswell from Glasgow. He was drawing an image of a post mortem sample of brain tissue from an MS patient and commented that "there appears to be vascular lesions here".

Dr Franz Schelling from Austria has been a lone voice for many years in promoting this theory and I spent an intriguing half hour with Franz as he drew the various venous sinuses on napkins at the CCSVI conference in Poland this year. It was Franz who convinced Paulo Zamboni to explore this field and the results of that collaboration has changed the world of medicine. The recent discovery of the importance of CCSVI has filled in many of the gaps in our understanding of the disease.

At the International Society of Neurovascular Diseasemeeting in Bologna in March this year, Dr David Hubbard, a consultant neurologist from San Diego, gave the clearest description of MS that I have ever heard. He described how leakage of blood products across the blood brain barrier caused the initial damage in the brain tissue. The immune system became aware of this damage and was triggered to respond as a secondary event. I sought him out later to congratulate him on his presentation and particularly the clarity of his description of how the vascular and immune parts of the disease interact. This made sense on many levels and explained why most current treatments are only partially effective as they are aimed at the secondary and not the primary driver of the disease. This new paradigm does not exclude the immune system and immune modulating drugs as part of a treatment regime but this new understanding gives new possibilities for treatment with the possibility of improved outcomes.

Treating venous pressure by means of angioplasty could be a relatively safe and easy way of improving outcomes in MS if this theory is proven to be correct. A recent study by Ivo Petrov from Bulgaria, presented a series of over 461 CCSVI procedures carried out in Sofia, showed no major complications which confirmed the safety of angioplasty in MS (1).

A new paper published in the Journal 'Brain' in June 2011 appears to support this new paradigm (2). A research team from Vienna examined post mortem samples of 30 MS patients and 25 controls who died of other causes. For the first time, they have shown that the most recent MS lesions were associated with oxidative stress damage consistent with leakage across the blood brain barrier. Older lesions showed the T lymphocyte infiltration typical of an immune response.

A good demonstration of the damage that blood products can produce is in cellulitis in legs associated with varicose veins. As the veins enlarge, the increased pressure in the vessel causes the junction between endothelial cells lining the vein to widen allowing blood products to leak into the leg tissues. This causes inflammation in the tissues with the classic inflammatory signs of redness, heat, swelling and pain as seen in this image.



The brain has the relative protection of the blood brain barrier but this is simply a tighter connection between endothelial cells, thirty proteins joining the cells as opposed to the usual ten. Increased venous pressure in the deep veins of the brain will eventually loosen even these tight junctions and when the blood products leak into brain tissue the damage will be similar to that seen in leg cellulitis. The secondary immune response is triggered to try in an attempt to limit this damage but in itself, this response can increase inflammation.

After seven years of successfully using LDN in the management of MS, I knew that the immune system was an important factor in all types of the disease. Paulo Zamboni, Franz Schnelling, David Hubbard and others are helping us to understand the complex interplay between the immune system and the venous system in MS. A combined approach to the management of the disease is a logical way forward.

Like any new paradigm, this will take some time to be accepted by all of those involved in treating and raising the awareness of this condition but as the research stacks up, it will become clear that a major step towards understanding and successfully treating MS has taken place.

There is still much to learn and many unanswered questions but CCSVI has taken us a long way towards better understanding and treatment of this complex condition.




References :
  1. Petrov I, Grozdinski L, Kaninski G, Iliev N, Iloska M, Radev A. J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Jun;18(3):314-23. Safety profile of endovascular treatment for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis.
  2. Haider et al. Oxidative damage in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions. Brain 7th june 2011



Using 388 MB of your 7613 MB
©2011 Google - Terms & Privacy
Disable buzz
Last account activity: 1 day ago
Details

Saturday, 6 August 2011

POST ANGIOPLASTY BLOG


The angioplasty is done after the venography confirmed reduce jugular venous flow and significant reflux.  The balloon angioplasty cleared most of what was possible and normalised the flow of blood from my head.

What a relief it is done! What will happen from now is anybody’s guess. Personally I am hoping for a stop in  the progression of the disease and any improvements that it might afford.  Whether CCSVI believers are right  or wrong, it is so relieving that an interest is being taken in this peculiar disease; information about rehabilitation; and positive words like regaining strength and function and improvement in quality of life; rather than sad shake of the head at our misfortune and a mental writing-off.  It’s all very positive that we might dare to hope, and hope we must.

It’s far too early to start listing gains and losses, hopes and fears, except that I will report a reduction in fatigue and brain fussiness. I believe my thinking is clearer, my husband might disagree. [Not at all – fully agree: husband]  Whilst we are on the subject of husbands, it would be impossible without Dugalds 100% support and encouragement, for which I shall be eternally grateful. Bless you my boy.

I recommend the Ameds Centrum clinic in Grodzick Mazowieski, near Warsaw, Poland. It was extremely professional and well organised with obvious skill, experience and a transparent wish to make things better for people who have previously been hopeless.  They work with integrity, investigating you thoroughly and only doing what is appropriate and safe for you.

 By the way if you mention the source of the recommendation you get a 5% discount (i.e. me). This translates into a good bottle of champagne to celebrate! 

Wednesday, 27 July 2011

Facebooks latest offering. They are coming thick and fast now and there will be more to come.

http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news%2Fhealth&id=8261767


  • Donna Chopyak ‎@ Jan, my friend called me last night to tell me that it was on the news & that was HER NEURO LMAO! Well, she'll be calling me today with info on how soon she can begin her CCSVI journey! We verified & the IR is part of the Hubbard Registry!
    6 hours ago ·  ·  1 person

  • Arlene Pellar Hubbard ‎@Donna, it's great that CCSVI is getting more media attention. We are very happy that Dr McGuckin is part of our registry. The data we collect is so valuable! @Jan you are so right!
    4 hours ago ·  ·  2 people

  • Laura Harrison Lewars Dr. McGucken was the doc who did my procedure a few weeks ago. I liked him alot. I have been dx'd for 16 yrs and have been stable due to herbal therapies I use. The only 2 things I had problems with were small motor functions like writing in my hands and balance issues. I am one in the 1/3 group for moderate improvement post CCSVI. BUT at least it's improvement and with work my handwriting is getting back to the way it used to be 10 yrs ago.
    33 minutes ago ·  ·  2 people

  • Donna Chopyak ‎@ Laura, I know you heard it b4 but I think things will continue to get even better! I'm just elated that it's FINALLY some getting media attention! Having been treated, I think it should be on EVERY STATION for the WORLD to acknowledge!!! I'm so happy for you Laura (& all of us)! :-)
    18 minutes ago · 

Hot pudding for the cold UK summer.


Forever mindful of the gluten and dairy free diet, I would like to suggest this as a very acceptable alternative to the hot pud so beloved by the Brits. Its adapted from Arlene Hubbard’s Beet Bake recipe . Hope you like it as much as I did.
You may have notice I am inordinately fond of red food.

The processor is used for minimum fuss and washing up

1.    Finely grate 4 raw beetroot
2.    Add 2 eggs
3.    Add 2 tea cups of ground almonds
4.    Add ½ cup sugar
5.    Add one teaspn ground cinnamon and a pinch of salt
6.    Process
7.    Add ½ cup whole hazelnuts
8.    Process briefly to break them up
9.    Add ½ cup cranberries
10.  Pulse only to mix
 Coat a loaf tin with oil and sprinkle with ground almonds.
Add cake mixture and bake at 160 degrees for about 1 hour or until done.
Serve with Red berry Sorbet or almond milk custard or both.
Lovely!

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

Frontiers | Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency in Multiple Scleros

Recent reports have emerged suggesting that multiple sclerosis (MS) may be due to abnormal venous outflow from the central nervous system, termed Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI). These reports have generated strong interest and controversy over the prospect of a treatable cause of MS.......more


http://www.frontiersin.org/endovascular_and_interventional_neurology/10.3389/fneur.2011.00044/full




www.frontiersin.org



Great CCSVI video

Kenneth Mandato recently gave a talk on CCSVI research at the Society of Interventional Radiology press conference in Albany, New York. He said the term CCSVI, short for Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency, would soon become part of mainstream vocabulary as more and more people were becoming aware of the condition and its treatment as a way of giving relief for MS symptoms. You can watch the video below. 




http://www.ccsvi.mx/interventional-radiologist-on-ccsvi-video

Friday, 22 July 2011

Some more overwhelming anecdotal evidence.


abclocal.go.com
Multiple sclerosis patients are traveling across the U.S. for a controversial but supposedly effective new treatment.


CCSVI just isnt going away.If you have had any evidence of change , good or bad, after angioplasty , share it with the world. We need the people to stand up, literally.

Sunday, 17 July 2011

Dave deBronkart: Meet e-Patient Dave | Video on TED.com

When Dave deBronkart learned he had a rare and terminal cancer, he turned to a group of fellow patients online -- and found the medical treatment that saved his life. Now he calls on all patients to talk with one another, know their own health data, and make health care better one e-Patient at a time.


MS Controversy: Inflating Veins, Deflating Symptoms

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis, also referred to as MS, is an autoimmune disease that affects the brain and spinal cord. Inflammation damages the nerves, causing impulses to be stopped or slowed. The cause of MS is unknown, and there is no cure. MS is more common in individuals of northern European descent, and women are more than twice as likely to develop MS as men. The condition usually affects people between the ages of 20 and 50 years, and the average age of onset is approximately 34 years.
(SOURCE: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NINDS Multiple Sclerosis Information Page)
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS: Most people experience their first symptoms of MS between 20 and 40 years of age. Initial symptoms often include blurred or double vision, red-green color distortion, or blindness in one eye. Many MS patients experience muscle weakness in their extremities and difficulty with coordination and balance. The symptoms may be severe enough to impair walking and standing and can produce partial or complete paralysis. MS patients also typically experience numbness, prickling, or "pins and needles" sensations, and pain. Hearing loss, speech impediments, tremors, and dizziness are other frequent complaints. Nearly half of all MS patients experience cognitive impairments such as difficulties with concentration, attention, memory, and poor judgment, but such symptoms are usually mild and are frequently overlooked.
(SOURCE: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NINDS Multiple Sclerosis Information Page)
TREATMENT: There are several treatment options for multiple sclerosis. They range from oral medications to injections. One newer and somewhat controversial treatment option is known as venoplasty for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency or CCSVI. CCSVI treatment is a non-operative, minimally invasive intervention. It is typically performed as part of a catheter-based endovascular procedure. CCSVI treatment requires either balloon angioplasty and/or stent placement to open or clear obstructions from the veins that drain the brain and spinal cord. Treatment risks include post-procedural bruising, infection and short-term (1-2 hours) post-procedure dizziness or headache.
The procedure was coined by Italian vascular surgeon, Paolo Zamboni, whose wife has MS. Zamboni theorized blood flow might be impaired by iron deposits clustered near the jugular veins. Almost all the patients Zamboni tested with Doppler ultrasound had veins in the neck that were narrowed, twisted or blocked. In 2009, Zamboni published results of a study after trying the balloon procedure on a small group, including his wife and finding that most had fewer MS attacks and improved quality of life. Patients reported abandoning their wheelchairs, being able to think more clearly and having better vision.
(SOURCE: ccsvi.org)
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER: Bulent Arslan, M.D., from Moffitt Cancer Center performs the venoplasty procedure. "The reason we started performing this specific procedure at Moffitt is because a patient contacted me personally after checking the Society of Interventional Radiology website and found out that I am an interventional radiologist with experience and interest in vein treatment. I agreed to provide this service to her and once she had a very good outcome, she referred more patients. As patients had good outcomes, we continued performing the procedure. Although the mission of Moffitt Cancer Center is obviously to help prevent and cure cancer, the center is not opposed to helping other patients in need if the physicians have time and ability to treat them."
Bulent Arslan, MD, an Associate Professor of Radiology at the University of South Florida and Associate Member at Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Interventional Radiology & Endovascular Therapy, talks about a controversial new treatment for patients with multiples sclerosis.
Can you quickly discuss how the idea of performing venograms for patients with MS came to be here at your clinic?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: The whole thing started through an e-mail from a patient who found my name on Society of International Radiology (SIR) website. All information regarding interventional radiologists who are members of SIR can be obtained via this site. One of my interests is endovascular treatment of vascular disease. We treat arteries and veins using catheters, wires, balloons and stents. The patient asked me if I was familiar with angioplasty procedure for treatment of CCSVI (chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency) and if I would be interested in performing it on her. I responded that, “I haven’t heard of the procedure other than just here and there. I haven’t performed this procedure on anybody yet, and I don’t know if it would benefit her in particular.” She then started sending me literature that had been published – myriad retrospective studies – and asked me if I would perform the procedure. I was a little reluctant. She said, “I live in Tampa. If you would do this for me, I would stay here otherwise I will have to travel to Bulgaria or some other place, which might not be safe for her. We then agreed on it. I told her that I could do the venogram, and if there is a significant blockage (you are not supposed to have a blockage in your veins), we could treat it although I am not promising anything because ultimately we are not sure that this is what it is. That is how it started. Subsequent to that, another patient contacted me who knew her, and then we scheduled and performed the procedure. She then had a dramatic improvement in her symptoms.
Was there anything that you saw that warranted this procedure?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: The ultrasound study that we performed demonstrated that the flow wasn’t as it was supposed to be. That is the initial test we perform – a noninvasive and nonharmful test that can be performed on anybody devoid of any risk. It tells us how the blood is flowing through the jugular veins. We observed abnormal flow in her ultrasound, which justified the venogram, a minimally invasive procedure to look at the veins in more detailed way. Once the venogram was performed, we saw a tightening on both of the jugular veins, which is not supposed to be there. People don’t know the prolifics yet, but bottom-line . . . if you have a vein or artery that has a blockage significant enough that there is a visual presentation, it should not be there and resulting in symptoms, this ultimately justifies correction.
What’s the connection to MS?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: The connection to MS is not fully understood. There is a theory that because of the blockage in the veins, there is a higher pressure in the intracranial veins, which results in either the exposure of the brain to toxic materials and/or micro-hemorrhages. That theory is not yet proven, but they suggest that MS could be result of these. The other theories are that this could just be a manifestation of MS. Regardless, there is one thing for sure, the venous abnormalities are much more common in MS patients. Even though the whole thing has not been proven yet with a prospective randomized trial, just seeing the level of stenosis in MS patients with the venograms that is being implemented in myriad centers, there is definitely a correlation.
What did you do for her with this procedure?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: We basically went in through the groin vein. We use a very small needle so that I can get into the vein and through that vein we can advance all the catheters and wires under the x-ray guidance to the veins we are interested in evaluating. We brought the catheter to her jugular vein, and place the catheter tip slightly above the jugular vein within the cerebral venous sinuses. At that position dye is injected into the venous system. Dye essentially replaces blood, and it shows us the shape of the veins as well as the flow patterns. If there is a reflux, which should not be happening, we are able to observe it via following the dye applied under X-Ray. The venous flow should be towards the heart, plus if there is an anatomical narrowing that we can identify, we will call our attention to that. That shows us where it should be treated and justifies the treatment. We put a balloon where the blockage is located and dilate that blockage with the balloon, and put our catheter back up and check it to see whether there was an improvement or not. We do that until we get enough improvement in the vein so that blood flow is not restricted. We did that on two of her jugular veins and achieved excellent results. According to our nurses, she started having symptomatic improvements (improved grip strength) on the table, which I didn’t believe at the time. Afterwards, her arm strength got quite a bit better and she started walking after her recovery period, which she was not able to do before.
Are you convinced that this is a procedure that works for MS patients or is the jury still out?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: The jury is still out. I’m sure that it helps certain patients significantly. It took me about five cases to truly believe in the benefit of it. With something totally new as this procedure you need time as well as evidence. We still need a randomized trial to make sure that there is no question on anybody’s mind. The fifth patient was the worst patient that I had ever treated. He came in, in a wheelchair, his arms and legs were contracted. His movements were very, very limited. He couldn’t even turn his head. He couldn’t clear his throat. He could not speak. He was legally blind. It was almost like a coma situation. We had to do his venogram from the left side because we could not straighten his right knee. We did this procedure, and he had the worst blockages until then. One side was approximately 99 percent blocked, and incessantly neurologists will ask, “Well, what about the gradient in the vein?” To prove a blockage to be real or not, you have to show that the blood pressure in the vein above the blockage as well as below the blockage has a significant difference. In him, it was a 18-millimeter mercury, which is very rare for the veins. You should have zero to tree pressure difference in the veins. So for him, 18-millimeter mercury pressure difference in the veins above and below the blockages on both sides, was very dramatic. You can never see that in a normal person. Period! We treated one of his sides with the balloon. The other side was completely blocked. It wouldn’t open up with the balloon, so I had to put a stent in, which I don’t like to do but in his case it had to be done because there was literally nothing to lose. He was supposed to come for his 4-week follow–up. He didn’t, so I was worried that he did not have any improvements. He showed up another 4-weeks later. He was able to move his arms. He is started to see. His vision went from 20/200 to 20/30. On his initial visit, his wife had to translate everything that he said because I was unable to understand him. But during the follow up visit he had this whole conversation with me with a very clear voice. He was still in a wheelchair, but he was able to eat, able to move his arms with contractures improved. He used to have 3-4 severe headache episodes everyday, which he did not have any since the day of the procedure. After that case, I had no question in my mind regarding the efficacy of this procedure. In due course, it is going to take a lot of convincing to show people the validity of this procedure if they haven’t witnessed it’s benefits firsthand as I have with these patients.
Why is this so controversial?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: People don’t know about it. Some neurologists refuse to see the patients who are considering this procedure (follow-up with the patients), and in medicine, rightfully, you need concrete evidence before you promote something. I’m all for that. I completely agree with that. All we have right now is what these patients see themselves, and I am the only one who is seeing this transformation. It’s not evidence. It’s just what you are experiencing. Assumption of this CCSVI-MS theory is correct also implies that all of those people over the years managing MS happened to miss this, which is not easy to accept unless the evidence is concrete. There is something called placebo effect in medicine. If a patient believes hard enough that they are going to improve as a result of a procedure or medicine, they will experience certain improvements. However, placebo can only go so far. These improvements will not be regaining sight for someone who was once blind. You cannot really do that no matter how hard you want it to happen. You are going to hear, “Oh . . I feel better. My fatigue is gone.” Those could be placebo. That can happen. In my experience, there are certain symptoms that are improving that are really not going to be impacted by the placebo effect. To prove that these results are not due to the placebo effect, we need to enlist 200 patients where 100 of them will not have the treatment and the other 100 will actually have the procedure. Patients will not know if they actually had the angioplasty or not and then a neurologist will examine them in an effort to determine if there is a difference between those two groups, which will hopefully happen soon.
Obviously this is not a cure. What is it?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: It is a treatment. It is used to relieve patients of their symptoms. It makes a huge impact on patient’s lifestyle, and we do a lot more for a lot less improvement in other fields for these patients. If you talk to these patients, it’s kind of a new life for them. Just being able to eat, not having to have a diaper – something as little as that has such an effect on these individuals. We take for granted what a lot of MS patients are unable to do. Any little improvement that you can give to them is a vast improvement in their eyes.
Do you think that this may become a standard of care?
Dr. Bulent Arslan: Yes, I think so. It may take a while. It could take anywhere from three to five years, but I think that this is going to become a common thing when the prospective randomized trials are done. Right now, the patients that are getting this treatment are only a minute fraction of all of the MS patients. There is a vast population of MS patients that are out there that are completely unaware of this treatment. Once the trials have concluded, if they support a benefit to MS patients, then it will become the standard of care. One thing about this treatment is that it is not a permanent solution or cure. Anytime that you angioplasty a vein or an artery, it will come back . . . it’s just a matter of time. They will need to repeat treatment. It is sort of a maintenance therapy in essence, similar to that of the drugs that you take all your life. Instead of everyday, it will be something that needs to be done again every six months or three years (depending on the patient and depending on the blockage).




http://www.ksat.com/health/28564250/detail.html